Table of Content

Open Access iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

Comparison of Constitutive Models Using Different Yield Functions for Porous Shape Memory Alloy with Experimental Date

Bingfei Liu, Guansuo Dui1, Yuping Zhu

1 BJTU, Beijing, China.

Structural Longevity 2010, 4(3), 113-120. https://doi.org/10.3970/sl.2010.004.113

Abstract

Several constitutive models with different yield functions for porous shape memory alloy (SMA) are compared with the experimental date. Different approaches such as upper bound theory and lower bound theory have been adopted and a new correction formula of the yield function is proposed in this work to study the behavior of porous SMAs. Numerical results are compared with the experimental date by Zhao et al (2005). It shows that the researches using upper bound and lower bound are nearly the same and the new correction formula is much closer to the experimental data than others.

Keywords


Cite This Article

APA Style
Liu, B., Dui, G., Zhu, Y. (2010). Comparison of constitutive models using different yield functions for porous shape memory alloy with experimental date. Structural Longevity, 4(3), 113-120. https://doi.org/10.3970/sl.2010.004.113
Vancouver Style
Liu B, Dui G, Zhu Y. Comparison of constitutive models using different yield functions for porous shape memory alloy with experimental date. Structural Longevity . 2010;4(3):113-120 https://doi.org/10.3970/sl.2010.004.113
IEEE Style
B. Liu, G. Dui, and Y. Zhu, “Comparison of Constitutive Models Using Different Yield Functions for Porous Shape Memory Alloy with Experimental Date,” Structural Longevity , vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 113-120, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3970/sl.2010.004.113



cc Copyright © 2010 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 508

    View

  • 365

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link