M. Heshmatzadeh, G. E. Bridges1
CMES-Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, Vol.18, No.1, pp. 45-58, 2007, DOI:10.3970/cmes.2007.018.045
Abstract Cell Method, a Finite Formulation technique, is compared in detail with the Finite Element Method (FEM), a differential-based numerical technique. In the finite formulation technique, Poisson's equation is described starting from a topological foundation. The final set of algebraic equations resulting from the two approaches are compared in matrix form. The equivalence of the coefficient matrices is proven for a Voronoi dual mesh and linear shape functions in the FEM. The difference between the source (charge) vectors in the two approaches is described. It is shown that the use of linear shape functions in the More >