Open Access
ARTICLE
The Impact of Sulfur Fertilizer Concentration on the Nutrient Concentration of Parts of the Soybean Plant
College of Agriculture, Agricultural College of Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, China
* Corresponding Author: Shoukun Dong. Email:
Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany 2024, 93(8), 1851-1873. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2024.051671
Received 12 March 2024; Accepted 26 June 2024; Issue published 30 August 2024
Abstract
Soybean is a crucial crop utilized for both food and oil production, with balanced crop nutrition being a key determinant of soybean yield throughout its growth cycle. Sulfur, an essential nutrient for crop growth, substantially impacts soybean yield. In this study, two soybean cultivars, Laidou 2 and Hefeng 55, were used to study the changes in nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and sulfur contents in soybean plants at different growth stages. Additionally, the effects of dry matter accumulation under five different sulfur levels were examined. The results showed that the sulfur levels had varying effects on the nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and sulfur contents and accumulation in different parts of the soybean plants. There were marked differences in the accumulation and distribution of dry matter in different parts of the soybean plant. Soybean dry matter weight shows the best overall performance under the S80 treatment. With increasing sulfur nutrition, the nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and sulfur contents in various plant parts exhibited an unimodal trend, reaching maximum values when the sulfur content was 80 mg/L. This study elucidates the dynamic changes in nutrient elements in soybeans under different sulfur levels and is important in guiding the rational application of sulfur fertilizers in agricultural production.Keywords
Cite This Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.