Open Access
ARTICLE
Interaction genotype x environment and analysis of stability in amaranth genotypes (Amaranthus spp.)
Profesor Investigador. Instituto Tecnológico del Valle de Guadiana, Durango. Apartado Postal 393. Durango, Dgo, México.
Profesor Investigador. División de Estudios de Posgrado, Facultad de Agronomía de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. Marín, N. L., e-mail: cigsvalloz@hotmail.com
Profesor Investigador. Instituto Politécnico Nacional CIIDIR-Unidad Durango, e-mail: ghiturbide@hotmail.com; ifierro62@yahoo.com
Profesor investigador de la Facultad de Agronomía de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, e-mail: omar-alvarado@prodigy.net.mx
* Corresponding Author:Address Correspondence to: Jesús García Pereyra, e-mail:
Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany 2011, 80(all), 167-173. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2011.80.167
Abstract
Five genotypes of amaranth were evaluated: four of Amaranthus hypochondriacus L. (collect 153-5-3, 653, 655 and Criollo Tlaxcala) and one of A. cruentus L. genotype 33. Studies were conducted in the cycle of spring-summer (PV) 2000 in Marín, N. L., and PV 2001 and PV 2002 in El Valle del Guadiana, Dgo. A completely randomized design with two repetitions was used, with factorial arrangement using split-plots, divided in space and time. The study population densities (DP) were 125000; 62500; 41666; 32500 and 18666 plants/ha. They analyzed (1) the stability of the genotypes exposed to different environments following Eberhart & Russell (1966), and (2) the grouping of the materials by their yield of grain (RG) and dry forage (FS) by the method of Francis & Kannenberg (1978). Study of interaction G x A indicated that the evaluated materials tended to behave differently in the various localities and evaluated population densities. For RG, genotypes 153-5-3 and 653 were superior to the rest of the genotypes with 30.5 and 29.3 g/plant to a DP of 18666 plants/ha. In yield of FS, genotypes A. cruentus 33 and 153-5-3 were superior to the other genotypes with 150 and 98 g/plant, respectively, to a DP of 18666 plants/ha at the two study sites.Keywords
Cite This Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.