Open Access
RETRACTION
Retraction: long noncoding RNA CAT104 promotes cell viability, migration, and invasion in gastric carcinoma cells through activation of microRNA-381-inhibiting zinc finger e-box-binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) expression
Oncology Research 2024, 32(11), 1821-1821. https://doi.org/10.32604/or.2024.056895
Issue published 16 October 2024
This article is a retraction of:
Long Noncoding RNA CAT104 Promotes Cell Viability, Migration, and Invasion in Gastric Carcinoma Cells Through Activation of MicroRNA-381-Inhibiting Zinc Finger E-box-Binding Homeobox 1 (ZEB1) Expression
Read original article
Abstract
This article has no abstract.The published article titled “long noncoding RNA CAT104 promotes cell viability, migration, and invasion in gastric carcinoma cells through activation of microRNA-381-inhibiting zinc finger e-box-binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) expression” has been retracted from Oncology Research, Vol. 26, No. 7, 2018, pp. 1037–1046.
DOI: 10.3727/096504017X15144748428127
URL: https://www.techscience.com/or/v26n7/56718
Following the publication, concerns have been raised about a number of figures in this article. The western blots in this article were presented with atypical, unusually shaped and possibly anomalous protein bands in many cases.
The authors were contacted and invited to comment on the concerns raised and to provide the original, unmodified figures, but did not respond. The Editors-in-Chief therefore no longer have confidence in the integrity of the data in this article and decided to retract this article.
All authors have not responded to correspondence about this retraction. As a responsible publisher, we hold the reliability and integrity of our published content in high regard. We deeply regret any inconvenience caused by this situation to our readers and all concerned parties.
Cite This Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.