Table of Content

Open Access iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

Comparison of Treatment Response and Survival Profiles Between Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Chinese Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

Ping Wen*, Sheng-Duo Chen*, Jia-Rui Wang, Ying-He Zeng*

* Division of Liver Disease, Hubei Provincial Hospital of TCM, Garden Hill School District, Wuhan, Hubei, P.R. China
† Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, Wuhan, Hubei, P.R. China

Oncology Research 2019, 27(5), 583-592. https://doi.org/10.3727/096504018X15368325811545

Abstract

This study evaluated the difference in treatment response and survival profiles between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) and conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) treatments in Chinese hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. A total of 120 HCC patients were consecutively enrolled in this prospective cohort study, which showed that DEB-TACE achieved higher complete response (CR) (30.8%) compared with cTACE (7.4%) with no difference in overall response rate (ORR) for patients treated with DEB-TACE and cTACE (80.8% vs. 73.5%). In addition, DEB-TACE was associated with a lower rate of progressive disease (PD) compared with cTACE (1.9% vs. 11.8%). With respect to survival, patients in the DEB-TACE group achieved median progression-free survival (PFS) of 15 months (95% CI 12–18 months), which was longer than the cTACE group [median PFS 11 months (95% CI 10–12 months)]. Median overall survival (OS) was also longer with DEB-TACE [25 months (95% CI 22-28 months)] when compared with cTACE [21 months (95% CI 18–24 months)]. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that DEB-TACE was an independent predictive factor for achieving CR. Univariate Cox’s regression analysis revealed that DEB-TACE was a predictive factor for prolonged PFS and OS, while multivariate analysis demonstrated that DEB-TACE was not an independent factor for predicting PFS or OS. In conclusion, we found that DEB-TACE achieved higher treatment response and prolonged survival compared with cTACE in Chinese HCC patients.

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); Overall survival; Response rate; Univariate analysis; Drug-eluting bead-transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE); Treatment response; Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE); Progression-free survival; Multivariate analysis

Cite This Article

APA Style
Wen, P., Chen, S., Wang, J., Zeng, Y. (2019). Comparison of Treatment Response and Survival Profiles Between Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Chinese Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study. Oncology Research, 27(5), 583–592. https://doi.org/10.3727/096504018X15368325811545
Vancouver Style
Wen P, Chen S, Wang J, Zeng Y. Comparison of Treatment Response and Survival Profiles Between Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Chinese Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study. Oncol Res. 2019;27(5):583–592. https://doi.org/10.3727/096504018X15368325811545
IEEE Style
P. Wen, S. Chen, J. Wang, and Y. Zeng, “Comparison of Treatment Response and Survival Profiles Between Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Chinese Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study,” Oncol. Res., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 583–592, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3727/096504018X15368325811545



cc Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 795

    View

  • 559

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link