Table of Content

Open Access iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

Comparison of Treatment Response and Survival Profiles Between Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Chinese Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

Ping Wen*, Sheng-Duo Chen*, Jia-Rui Wang, Ying-He Zeng*

* Division of Liver Disease, Hubei Provincial Hospital of TCM, Garden Hill School District, Wuhan, Hubei, P.R. China
† Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, Wuhan, Hubei, P.R. China

Oncology Research 2019, 27(5), 583-592. https://doi.org/10.3727/096504018X15368325811545

Abstract

This study evaluated the difference in treatment response and survival profiles between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) and conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) treatments in Chinese hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. A total of 120 HCC patients were consecutively enrolled in this prospective cohort study, which showed that DEB-TACE achieved higher complete response (CR) (30.8%) compared with cTACE (7.4%) with no difference in overall response rate (ORR) for patients treated with DEB-TACE and cTACE (80.8% vs. 73.5%). In addition, DEB-TACE was associated with a lower rate of progressive disease (PD) compared with cTACE (1.9% vs. 11.8%). With respect to survival, patients in the DEB-TACE group achieved median progression-free survival (PFS) of 15 months (95% CI 12–18 months), which was longer than the cTACE group [median PFS 11 months (95% CI 10–12 months)]. Median overall survival (OS) was also longer with DEB-TACE [25 months (95% CI 22-28 months)] when compared with cTACE [21 months (95% CI 18–24 months)]. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that DEB-TACE was an independent predictive factor for achieving CR. Univariate Cox’s regression analysis revealed that DEB-TACE was a predictive factor for prolonged PFS and OS, while multivariate analysis demonstrated that DEB-TACE was not an independent factor for predicting PFS or OS. In conclusion, we found that DEB-TACE achieved higher treatment response and prolonged survival compared with cTACE in Chinese HCC patients.

Keywords


Cite This Article

APA Style
Wen, P., Chen, S., Wang, J., Zeng, Y. (2019). Comparison of treatment response and survival profiles between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization and conventional transarterial chemoembolization in chinese hepatocellular carcinoma patients: A prospective cohort study. Oncology Research, 27(5), 583-592. https://doi.org/10.3727/096504018X15368325811545
Vancouver Style
Wen P, Chen S, Wang J, Zeng Y. Comparison of treatment response and survival profiles between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization and conventional transarterial chemoembolization in chinese hepatocellular carcinoma patients: A prospective cohort study. Oncol Res. 2019;27(5):583-592 https://doi.org/10.3727/096504018X15368325811545
IEEE Style
P. Wen, S. Chen, J. Wang, and Y. Zeng, “Comparison of Treatment Response and Survival Profiles Between Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Chinese Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study,” Oncol. Res., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 583-592, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3727/096504018X15368325811545



cc Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 620

    View

  • 468

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link