Table of Content

Open Access iconOpen Access

ARTICLE

A Retrospective Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Gefitinib, Erlotinib, and Afatinib in Japanese Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Atsushi Fujiwara*, Masamichi Yoshida*, Hajime Fujimoto, Hiroki Nakahara, Kentaro Ito, Kota Nishihama§, Taro Yasuma§, Osamu Hataji, Osamu Taguchi, Corina N. D’Alessandro-Gabazza§, Esteban C. Gabazza§, Tetsu Kobayashi

* Department of Respiratory Medicine, Mie Prefectural General Medical Center, Yokkaichi, Mie, Japan
† Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
‡ Respiratory Center, Matsusaka Municipal Hospital, Mie, Japan
§ Department of Immunology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
¶ Mie University Center for Physical and Mental Health, Tsu, Mie, Japan

Oncology Research 2018, 26(7), 1031-1036. https://doi.org/10.3727/096504018X15151523767752

Abstract

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are very effective against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) caused by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. Before the approval of osimertinib in March 2016, there were only three available EGFR TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib) for the therapy of NSCLC in Japan. Osimertinib can be indicated only against T790M+ lung cancer as a second-line therapy. However, whether gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib is most appropriate as a first-line therapy is still a controversial issue. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 310 patients with the diagnosis of EGFR mutation-associated NSCLC including 147 patients treated with EGFR TKIs. Time to treatment failure and overall survival were evaluated. There were no significant differences in time to treatment failure (gefitinib: 9.2 months; erlotinib: 9.8 months; afatinib: 13.1 months) and overall survival (gefitinib: 27.3 months; erlotinib: 29.3 months; afatinib data not available) among NSCLC patients treated with the three different EGFR TKIs. Subgroup analysis showed that smoking status has a significant influence on both time to treatment failure and overall survival. In conclusion, this study showed comparable clinical efficacy of gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib in Japanese patients with NSCLC.

Keywords


Cite This Article

APA Style
Fujiwara, A., Yoshida, M., Fujimoto, H., Nakahara, H., Ito, K. et al. (2018). A retrospective comparison of the clinical efficacy of gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib in japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Oncology Research, 26(7), 1031-1036. https://doi.org/10.3727/096504018X15151523767752
Vancouver Style
Fujiwara A, Yoshida M, Fujimoto H, Nakahara H, Ito K, Nishihama K, et al. A retrospective comparison of the clinical efficacy of gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib in japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Res. 2018;26(7):1031-1036 https://doi.org/10.3727/096504018X15151523767752
IEEE Style
A. Fujiwara et al., "A Retrospective Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Gefitinib, Erlotinib, and Afatinib in Japanese Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer," Oncol. Res., vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1031-1036. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3727/096504018X15151523767752



cc Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 112

    View

  • 99

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link