Journal of Renewable Materials |
DOI: 10.32604/jrm.2022.017781
ARTICLE
Performance of Densified Wood Glulam as Building Bio-Material
1Wood and Forest Products Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, 19395-1113, Iran
2Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, 19395-1113, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Amir Nourbakhsh. Email: Nourbakhsh_amir@yahoo.com
Received: 06 June 2021; Accepted: 05 July 2021
Abstract: In this research, some practical aspects of densified wood glulam were investigated. For this aim, poplar wood specimens were densified by hygro-thermo-mechanical technique. Glulam specimens were produced by finger joint technique and polyurethane glue was used as resin. Physical and mechanical properties of glulams were investigated according to ASTM D 143-09, ASTM D 905-03 and ISO 8375 standards. Based on obtained results, using this process (steam and pressurize compaction) resulted in improvement of physical and mechanical properties of glulam specimens. Optical microscopic and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) pictures were proved structural changes on wood material during of applied technique. Generally, the increase of wood density and hygrothermal treatment has a positive role on the glulam properties especially its dimensional stability. This technique showed a significant effect on water absorption; the steaming temperature and holding time significantly decreased water absorption but densification process increased this parameter. Also, delamination of specimens was decreased by hygrothermal treatment while densification showed negative effect on delamination. Moreover , modulus of rupture, modulus of elasticity, shear strength and compression strength parallel to grain were decreased by this technique but it is depend to treatment temperature and holding time. Higher temperature and holding time cause to higher decrease in the glulam mechanical strength.
Keywords: Wood; modification; glued laminated timber; physical and mechanical properties
Considering environmental sustainability, using renewable materials like wood timber and other wood products for building construction have major priority than other materials. Glue laminated timber (glulam) is one of the most popular and most used type of engineered wood products in recent years [1]. This product is made from sawn lumber lamina glued together in horizontal layers, using scarf or finger joints to provide the desired length [2]. Sawn lumber laminations bonded together with a resin, so that the grain of all layers runs parallel with the longitudinal direction [3]. One of the disadvantages of massive wood in applications is dimensional restriction. Glulam can be made from small-diameter timber and provide high strength and large spans in architectural designs and other applications. In order to enhance the bearing capacity of structural components, save materials, and reduce cost, a glulam that is theoretically suitable for engineering application [4]. Also, Glulam can bring the natural beauty of source wood in wooden construction, and widely used. This is due to its unique properties such as easy production, lightness, high strength and various forms of its application. The other structural application of glulam is in columns, trusses, reinforcing members, bridges deck and etc. Besides, the bonding ability of glulam components provides it for further applications [4–9]. The interest to apply this technology is to reduce product variability and make it less affected by natural growth features like knots. In addition, the glulam technology offers almost unlimited possibilities of shape and design for construction, and is widely used for load bearing structures in houses, pedestrian bridges, warehouses, etc.
However, glulam has some disadvantages and limitations of solid wood such as water absorption, swelling, etc. Therefore, the various methods of modification has been used in recent years such as chemical modification, thermal treatment, enzymatic modification, or a combination of them to improve these materials characteristics and their applications capabilities.
The modification generally targets dimensional stability, i.e., reduce moisture induced movement, and increase durability, i.e., resistance to degradation [10]. One of the modification methods is hydrothermal treatment. The results of studies in different fields of hydrothermal processes showed that wood physical characteristics are improved due to the treatment [11]. In hydrothermal process, formation of the hydronium ions due to water hydrolysis causes hydrolysis of lignocellulosic linkages. In fact, hydronium ions act as an acid and hydrolyze wood polysaccharides. In the presence of ions, reactions of hydrolysis and de-acetylation increased in cell wall [12]. There are no some problems such as harmful components, corrosion, chemical recovery and destruction in this method [13]. The hygrothermal treatment removes the acetyl groups of acetylated hemicelluloses by generating of acetic acid. This acid lead to production of water-soluble mono saccharides (glucose, galactose, mannose, arabinose and xylose) due to hydrolyses of cell wall polysaccharides [14,15]. Moreover, the produced acetic acid is a factor promoting lignin breakdown. Degradation of ß-O-4 linkages in lignin of the softwood during hydrothermal treatment cause decrease wood rigidity [16]. The reconstructed lignin improves bending strength of the treated sample as well as resistance to water adsorption [17,18].
Heat treatments are the other eco-friendly modification methods usually which carried out at a temperature of 160–260°C [19,20]. Heat treatment of wood at temperature of 140–260°C improves dimensional stability of wood [21–23]. Moreover, it causes less moving of moisture in [24], improvement of biological degradation resistance [25,26]. However, wood treatment at high temperatures reduces its mechanical resistance such as strength, hardness and stiffness [27]. Reduction of mechanical properties depends on the method of heat treatment, time and temperature of treatment, wood species, initial moisture content of wood and heating atmosphere [28]. In order to solve this problem in thermal and hydrothermal treatments we can use other modification methods including mechanical modification, hydro-thermo-mechanical modification, hygro-thermo-mechanical modification and etc.
Increasing the density of wood enhances most of its mechanical properties. Wood compression is an effective method to increase the density of wood [29]. The compressed wood products can be substitute with high density wood products [30]. Therefore densification of wood is suitable for low-density species such as aspen and poplar hybrid [31]. On the other hand, due to the hydrothermal modification, which occurs in the wood densification processes, the obtained products have a higher mechanical properties [32,33], reduced equilibrium moisture content [34], improved biological strength [35] as well as dimensional stability [36–39].
Thermo-hygro-mechanical treatment is the other modification method in which used heat, steam, and pressure [33,35,39–45]. This technique not only makes wood hydrophobic [43,46,47] and resistant to biological degradation [48,49], but also increases its mechanical strength [43,50]; therefore it can be used for low-density species such as poplar [31,43].
In the current research work, the applying necessity of hygro-thermo-mechanical treatment in glulam production is due to elimination of disadvantages and limitations of solid wood. Therefore, obtaining optimum conditions in this method can bring superior functional properties of the product. In other words, in hygro-thermo-mechanical technique, not only the proper condition of steaming and heating can provide suitable physical properties, but also densification process resolve some mechanical weaknesses which caused by hygrothermal treatment such as lose weight and strength reduction.
Wood blocks were prepared from poplar wood (Populus deltoides) with dimensions of 50 × 50 × 500 mm3. Then, the specimens treated hygrothermally at temperatures of 130, 150, and 170°C for holding time of 20 and 40 min. Afterwards, poplar blocks due to the high moisture content were initially air dried and then oven-dried to achieve MC (moisture content) 15 percent. Compression process of wood blocks were immediately carried out by hot press in radial direction with a compression set of 40% and 60% and press temperatures of 160°C for 20 min [43]. Tab. 1 shows composition of variable parameters with related code. Polyurethane resin (Mokarrar Co., Iran) was used as adhesive for glulam production.
The next step (after treatments and climatisation) was to make finger joint on the treated specimens. The specimens were then cut in desired longitudinal dimension to glulam production. 6 blade Groove cuter were used for preparing the finger joints. Polyurethane adhesive with consumption rate of 200 g/m2 were used to connect prepared blocks. The assembled glulams were placed in cold press with pressure 0.8 N/mm2 for 8 h [51]. Fig. 1 shows assembled glulam, cold press and completion of resin curing after press. Finally, the glulams were conditioned at 25 ± 2°C temperature and 65 ± 5% relative humidity for 4 weeks. Totally, 75 glulams were made according to variable factors (three levels of steaming temperature, two levels of holding time and two levels of compression set) with 5 replications and also control specimens (control specimens, control specimens with compression set of 40% and control specimens with compression 60%).
The mechanical properties (bending strength, modulus of elasticity, shear strength of glueline and compression strength parallel to grain) of glulams which made from treated and untreated wood specimens were determined according to ASTM D 143-09, ASTM D 905-03 and ISO 8375. Physical properties such as density (5 × 5 × 5 cm3), water absorption, radial and tangential swelling, dimensional stability (Anti swelling efficiency) as well as delamination were also determined. The results were statistically analyzed based on a complete randomized design under factorial experiment and the mean values were grouped according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
The results showed that wood densification based on the compression sets (C.S.) of 40% and 60% significantly increased the glulam density in controls and treated specimens due to increment of wood material in equal volume (Fig. 2). The effect of variable parameters on density in Fig. 2 also indicated that the density of hygrothermal treated specimens was a little more than control specimens with the same C.S. which is due to collapse and enhancement of density in equal volume [51].
The results showed that steaming temperature, holding time as well as compression set had significant effect on water absorption after 24, 48 and 72 h soaking in water. Figs. 3a and 3b showed the comparison of steaming temperature effect on water absorption after 24 and 72 h of soaking in water. The results revealed positive effect of steaming temperature on water absorption properties, so that, the water absorption of treated specimens at steaming temperature of 170°C was lower than control specimens. Moreover, this figure revealed that moisture absorption was decreased with increasing of holding time. The elimination of hemicelluloses due to hydrolysis reaction and blocking of hydroxyl groups in cellulose, reduce hygroscopic feature and water absorption of wood [43]. In fact, the presence of hemicelluloses-derived acetic acid not only causes hydrolyze the polysaccharides of cell wall, but is also a factor for promoting lignin breakdown. Therefore, elimination of hydroxyl groups and modified lignin improve the resistance of treated wood to water absorption [15,17,18]. Moreover, using of waterproof polyurethane adhesive can also be a factor to reduction of water absorption.
As indicated in Fig. 3, water absorption after 24 and 72 h of soaking in water had increased with compression set enhancement, due to the greater volume of wood material. Interaction effect of compression set on water absorption in Fig. 3 revealed the positive effect of hygrothermal modification on water absorption of treated specimens in compared with controls. So that, the water absorption of control specimens with compression set of 40% and 60% were higher than hygrothermal treated specimens with the same densification.
3.1.3 Radial and Tangential Swelling
The thickness swelling of glulams in radial and tangential direction was determined after 24 and 48 h of soaking in water. The results revealed that the radial swelling was reduced by increasing of the steaming temperature as well as the holding time after 24 and 48 h of soaking in water (Fig. 4). So that the least radial swelling, between the compressed specimens, was related to steaming temperature of 170°C and holding time of 40 min (Fig. 4). As previously mentioned, the elimination of hemicelluloses due to hydrolysis reaction and blocking of hydroxyl groups in cellulose caused reduction of hygroscopic feature of wood and radial thickness swelling [43].
The interaction effect of compression set on radial swelling, as indicated in Fig. 4, revealed that an enhancement of the compression set caused increase of the radial swelling of glulams. But remarkable point was low radial swelling of treated specimens by hygrothermal process compared the control specimens with the same compression set. This appeared significant effect of hygrothermal treatment on reduction of water absorption and swelling.
According to the results, the tangential swelling of specimens after 24 and 48 h of soaking in water was reduced by increasing of hygro-thermo-mechanical treatment parameters as steaming temperature, holding time and compression set (Figs. 5a and 5b). The increasing of steaming temperature and holding time caused the hemicelluloses hydrolysis and elimination or blocking of hydroxyl groups in cellulose and finally were reduced tangential swelling [43]. But edge cutting of compressed wood with compression set of 60% removed more wood materials in compared with compression set of 40%; therefore, after soaking of specimens in water and radial thickness swelling, their sides become concave and tangential swelling decreased, consequently (Fig. 6).
The dimensional stability of specimens was determined after 5 stages of soaking-drying (24 h soaking in water and then oven drying). The results showed significant effect of steaming temperature as well as the holding time on dimensional stability. As indicated in the Fig. 7, the dimensional stability of the treated specimens at steaming temperature of 130 and 150°C and holding time of 20 min had no any significant change during the five cycles, which appears positive and lasting effect of hygrothermal treatment on dimensional stability. But when the steaming temperature and holding time were raised to 170°C and 40 min, respectively, the dimensional stability decreased with continuing of soaking-drying cycles. Because intensification of hygrothermal treatment condition caused brittleness of the lignin polymer as well as the cleaved cellulose polymer chains [43], as a result, applying mechanical force create small crack and fractures which can increase moisture penetration and also water absorption.
The delamination of glulam specimens was determined after two soaking-drying cycles (24 h soaking in water and then oven drying). The results revealed positive significant effect of hygro-thermo-mechanical treatment on delamination, so that, the delamination of treated specimens by this process were less than control specimens (Fig. 8). According to the results shown in Fig. 8, the delamination of control specimens had increased by raising of compression set, but it was vice versa about hygrothermal treated specimens; so that, the delamination of hygro-thermo-mechanical treated specimens with compression set of 40% and 60% had reduction of 44.8% and 70.03% respectively in compared with control specimens with the same compression set. The hygrothermal treatment not only reduces moisture absorption, swelling as well as swelling-derived stress due to the hemicelluloses hydrolysis and elimination or blocking of hydroxyl groups in cellulose, but also caused brittleness of the lignin polymer and cleavage of cellulose polymer chains [43]. On the other hand, compression process increases small cracks, as a result improve adhesive penetration as well as the mechanical junctions. Therefore, all of these factors can reduce the delamination of hygro-thermo-mechanical treated specimens.
3.2.1 Modulus of Rupture and Modulus of Elasticity
The result revealed all parameters of hygro-thermo-mechanical treatment had significant effect on bending modulus of rupture (MOR). According to the results shown in Fig. 9a, the MOR of the control specimens was increased by densification because of density enhancement [32,33]. Also, SEM photos (Fig. 10) clearly showed that how densification occurred during treatment. Increasing the wood compaction causes to increase the MOR in treated wood. But in the hygrothermal treated specimens, increase of the steaming temperature showed different effects on the MOR (Fig. 9a). As shown, the MOR was increased up to temperature 150°C and then there was reduction at treatment temperature of 170°C. There was also reduction of MOR when the holding time was raised up to 40 min (Fig. 9a). Moreover, Similar with the control specimens, increase of the densification intensity had positive effect on the MOR of the hygrothermal treated specimens. The MOR of hygrothermal treated specimens with C.S. of 40% was more than control specimens with the same densification (Fig. 9a). There was also a little difference between MOR of control specimens with C.S. of 60% and hygrothermal treated specimens with the same densification (Fig. 9a). This appears because of the significant effect of hygrothermal modification on MOR.
The Modulus of elasticity (MOE) of glulam was increased due to temperature and holding time of hygrothermal treatment (Fig. 9b). However, the holding time had no significant effect on MOE but the steaming temperature was much more effective (Fig. 9b). Results also revealed that the MOE was increased due to the densification process as well as enhancement of compression set in control glulams (Fig. 9b). As shown in Fig. 9b, the hygrothermal treatment caused reduction of the MOE by increase of compression set. However, the MOE of glulams made from hygrothermal treated specimens with C.S. 40% and 60% was greater 15.5% and 4.8% than controls with the same compression set, respectively.
3.2.2 Shear Strength of Glueline
As indicated in Fig. 11, the densification process generally followed by improvement of the shear strength of glueline in controls. However, the increase of C.S. from 40 up to 60% caused reduction of this mechanical property in control specimens. Moreover, Fig. 12 shows structural of glueline in control glulams. It is clearly indicates that compression can create an integrated glueline and caused increment of the shear strength. Based on obtained results, the hygrothermal treatment temperature was the only significant negative parameter on shear strength of glueline. As shown, the least shear strength of glueline was determined in steaming temperature of 170°C (Fig. 11). The parameters holding time and compression set had a slight effect on shear strength of glueline in glulams made from hygro-thermo-mechanical treated specimens (Fig. 11).
The results of shear strength of glueline also showed that all the failures occurred in the wood area (Fig. 13). In fact, hydrolysis of polysaccharides due to increasing the hygrothermal temperature causes shortening of the cellulose chain, in addition lignin and wood structure get brittle. Therefore compression causes small cracks in wood structure and as a result the shear strength of the wood is reduced, which ultimately leads to a decrease in the shear strength of the glueline.
3.2.3 Compression Strength Parallel to Grain
Results revealed, among the hygro-thermo-mechanical treatment parameters, the steaming temperature was the only significant factor on compression strength parallel to the grain. As the results indicates in Fig. 14, the steaming temperature 150°C followed by the most compression strength parallel to the grain. Altogether, the densification process drastically increased compression strength parallel to the grain in controls (Fig. 14). However, the increase of C.S. up to 60% caused reduction of this mechanical feature in controls (Fig. 14). As shown, the least compression strength parallel to the grain was determined in control specimens without any treatment (Fig. 14), i.e., hygro-thermo-mechanical treatment totally caused improvement of compression strength parallel to the grain.
Based on the findings of this study the application of hygro-thermo-mechanical process resulted improvement of physical and mechanical properties of glulam. In this process, the compression increases density and hygrothermal treatment has a positive role in this field. All of applied process parameters have significant effect on water absorption; so that the steaming temperature and holding time drastically reduce water absorption but densification process increases this feature. The radial swelling decreases by increasing of hygrothermal parameters (steaming temperature and holding time); while compression process increases it. Moreover, all parameters of hygro-thermo-mechanical process decrease tangential swelling. Dimensional stability of specimens improves due to the hygrothermal treatment of this process.
The delamination of specimens increase by densification process, while hygrothermal treatment parameters decrease the delamination. Also, this modification method has completely positive effect on MOR and MOE. In this technique, compression process increases MOR while hygrothermal treatment caused reduction of MOR; and this is vice versa about MOE. The shear strength of glueline generally decreases by hygro-thermo-mechanical process. This method completely improves the compression strength parallel to the grain. The compression process increases this mechanical property, while hygrothermal treatment caused its reduction.
Acknowledgement: Authors would like to express their special thanks to Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO) and Tarbiat Modares University for their scientific support in this research.
Funding Statement: The authors received no specific funding for this study.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.
1. Yang, R., Li, H., Dauletbek, A., Ashraf, M., Lorenzo, R. et al. (2021). Effects of freeze-thaw cycles on physical and mechanical properties of glulam exposed to outdoor environment. Journal of Renewable Materials, 99(7), 1293–1307. DOI 10.32604/jrm.2021.015296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Yang, T. H., Wang, S. Y., Tsai, M. J., Lin, C. Y. (2009). The charring depth and charring rate of glued laminated timber after a standard fire exposure test. Building and Environment, 44, 231–236. DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.02.010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
3. Issa, C. A., Kmeid, Z. (2005). Advanced wood engineering: Glulam beams. Construction and Building Materials, 19, 99–106. DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.05.013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Yang, R., Hong, C., Zhang, X., Yuan, Q., Sun, Y. (2020). Experimental research on structural behaviors of glulam I-beam with a special-shaped section. Journal of Renewable Materials, 8(2), 113–132. DOI 10.32604/jrm.2020.08190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. Okamoto, S., Akiyama, N., Araki, Y., Aoki, K., Inayama, M. (2021). Study on the strength of glued laminated timber beams with round holes: Difference in structural performance between homogeneous-grade and heterogeneous-grade timber. Journal of Wood Science, 67, 8. DOI 10.1186/s10086-021-01941-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
6. LaCross, V. D., Manbeck, H. B., Witmer, R. W., Laman, J. A., Janowiak, J. J. (2000). Endurance of deck-to-deck connections in transverse hardwood glulam decks. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 5(1), 84–9. DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:1(84). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
7. Smith, I., Foliente, G., Nguyen, M., Syme, M. (2005). Capacities of dowel-type fastener joints in Australian pine. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering ASCE, 17(6), 664–75. DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:6(664). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
8. Stehn, L., Börjes, K. (2004). The influence of nail ductility on the load capacity of a glulam truss structure. Engineering Structures, 26(6), 809–16. DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.01.012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
9. Zahn, J. J., Rammer, D. R. (1995). Design of glued laminated timber columns. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 121(12), 1789–94. DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:12(1789). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
10. Hill, C. A. S. (2006). Wood modification: Chemical, thermal and other processes. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [Google Scholar]
11. Kozakiewicz, P., Drożdżek, M., Laskowska, A., Grześkiewicz, M., Bytner, O. et al. (2019). Effects of thermal modification on the selected physical properties of sapwood and heartwood of black poplar (Populus nigra L.). BioResources, 14, 8391–8404. [Google Scholar]
12. Liu, S. (2008). A kinetic model on autocatalytic reactions in woody biomass hydrolysis. Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy, 2, 135–147. DOI 10.1166/jbmb.2008.304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
13. Garrote, G., Domínguez, H., Parajó, J. C. (1999). Hydrothermal processing of lignocellulosic materials. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff, 57, 191–202. DOI 10.1007/s001070050039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
14. Ramos, L. P. (2003). The chemistry involved in the steam pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials. Química Nova, 26, 863–871. DOI 10.1590/S0100-40422003000600015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
15. Assor, C., Placet, V., Chabbert, B., Habrant, A., Lapierre, C. et al. (2009). Concomitant changes in viscoelasticity properties and amorphous polymers during the hydrothermal treatment of hardwood and softwood. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57, 6830–6837. DOI 10.1021/jf901373s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
16. Biswas, A. K., Yang, W., Blasiak, W. (2011). Steam pretreatment of salix to upgrade biomass fuel for wood pellet production. Fuel Processing Technology, 92, 1711–1717. DOI 10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.04.017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
17. Lam, P. S., Sokhansanj, S., Bi, X., Lim, C. J., Melin, S. (2011). Energy input and quality of pellets made from steam exploded douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Energy & Fuels, 25, 1521–1528. DOI 10.1021/ef101683s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
18. Militz, H. (2002). Thermal treatment of wood. european processes and their background. IRG/WP 02-40241. 33rd Annual Meeting, 4, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
19. Militz, H. (2008). Process and properties of thermally modified wood manufactured in Europe. ACS Symposium Series, vol. 982, pp. 372–388. DOI 10.1021/bk-2008-0982.ch022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
20. González-Peña, M. M., Breese, M. C., Hill, C. A. S. (2004). Hygroscopicity in heat treated wood: Effect of extractives. 1st International Conference on Environmentally-Compatible Forest Products, pp. 105–109. Fernando Pessoa University, Oporto, Portugal. [Google Scholar]
21. Krause, A., Hof, C., Militz, H. (2004). Novel wood modification processes for window and cladding products. 35th Annual Meeting, International Research Group on Wood Protection. [Google Scholar]
22. Obataya, E., Tomita, B. (2002). Hygroscopicity of heat-treated wood II, reversible and irreversible reductions in the hygroscopicity of wood Due to heating. Mokuzai Gakkaishi, 48(4), 288–295. [Google Scholar]
23. Militz, H., Tjeerdsma, B. (2001). Heat treatment of wood by the PLATO process. In: Rapp, A. O. (EditorReview on Heat Treatments of Wood. COST ACTION E22: Environmental Optimisation of Wood Protection, pp. 27–38. [Google Scholar]
24. Huang, C. X., Lin, W. Q., Lai, C. H., Li, X., Jin, Y. C. et al. (2019). Coupling the post-extraction process to remove residual lignin and alter the recalcitrant structures for improving the enzymatic digestibility of acid pretreated bamboo residues. Bioresource Technology, 285, 121355, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
25. Welzbacher, C. R., Wehsener, J., Rapp, A. O., Haller, P. (2008). Thermo-mechanical densification combined with thermal modification of Norway spruce (Picea abies karst) in industrial scale-dimensional stability and durability aspects. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff, (66), 39–49. DOI 10.1007/s00107-007-0198-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
26. González-Peña, M. M., Hale, M. D. C. (2007). The relationship between mechanical performance and chemical changes in thermally modified wood. Proceedings 3rd European Conference on Wood Modification, pp. 169–172. [Google Scholar]
27. Sundqvist, B., Karlsson, O., Westermark, U. (2006). Determination of formic-acid and acetic acid concentrations formed during hydrothermal treatment of birch wood and its relation to colour, strength and hardness. Wood Science and Technology, 40, 549–561. DOI 10.1007/s00226-006-0071-z. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
28. Bytner, O., Laskowska, A., Drożdżek, M., Kozakiewicz, P., Zawadzki, J. (2021). Evaluation of the dimensional stability of black poplar wood modified thermally in nitrogen atmosphere. Materials, 14, 1491. DOI 10.3390/ma14061491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
29. Dwianto, W., Inoue, M., Tanaka, F., Norimoto, M. (1998). The permanent fixation of compressive deformation in wood by heat treatment. Proceeding of 3rd Pacific Rim Bio-Based Composite Symposium, pp. 231–239. [Google Scholar]
30. Gong, M., Lamason, C., Li, L. (2010). Interactive effect of surface densification and post-heat- treatment on aspen wood. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 210, 293–296. DOI 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.09.013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
31. Blomberg, J. (2005). Elastic strain at semi-isostatic compression of Scots pine (Pinussylvestris). Journal of Wood Science, 51, 401–404. [Google Scholar]
32. Kutnar, A., Kamke, F., Sernek, M. (2008). Density and morphology of viscoelastic thermal compressed (VTC) wood. Wood Science and Technology. DOI 10.1007/s00226-008-0198-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
33. Metsa-Kortelainen, S., Antikainen, T., Viitaniemi, P. (2006). The water absorption of sapwood and heartwood of Scots pine and Norway spruce heat-treated at 170°C, 190°C, 210°C and 230°C. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff, 64 (3), 192–197. [Google Scholar]
34. Boonstra, M. J., Blomberg, J. (2007). Semi-isostatic densification of heat-treated radiate pine. Wood Science and Technology, 41, 607–617. [Google Scholar]
35. Esteves, B., Marques, A. V., Domingos, I., Pereira, H. (2007). Influence of steam on the properties of pine (Pinus pinaster) and eucalypt (Eucalyptus globulus) wood. Wood Science and Technology, 41, 193–207. [Google Scholar]
36. Hillis, W. E. (1984). High temperature and chemical effects on wood stability. Part 1–General considerations. Wood Science and Technology, 18, 281–293. [Google Scholar]
37. Hsu, W. E., Schwald, W., Schwald, J., Shields, J. A. (1988). Chemical and physical changes required for producing dimensionally stable wood-based composites. Wood Science and Technology, 22, 281–289. [Google Scholar]
38. Inoue, M., Norimoto, M., Tanahashi, M., Rowell, M. R. (1993). Steam or heat fixation of compressed wood. Wood and Fiber Science, 25(3), 224–235. [Google Scholar]
39. Dwianto, W., Morooka, T., Norimoto, M., Kitajima, T. (1999). Stress relaxation of Sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. don) wood in radial compression under high temperature steam. Holzforschung, 53, 541–546. [Google Scholar]
40. Fukuta, S., Takasu, Y., Sasaki, Y., Hirashima, Y. (2007). Compressive deformation process of Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica). Wood and Fiber Science, 39, 548–555. [Google Scholar]
41. Ito, Y., Tanahashi, M., Shigematsu, M., Shinoda, Y., Ohta, C. (1998). Compressive-molding of wood by high-pressure steam-treatment: Part 1, development of compressively molded squares from thinnings. Holzforschung, 52, 211–216. DOI 10.1515/hfsg.1998.52.2.211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
42. Mohebby, B., Sharifnia-Dizboni, H., Kazemi-Najafi, S. (2009). Combined hydro-thermo-mechanical modification (CHTM) as an innovation in mechanical wood modification. Proceeding of 4th European Conference on Wood Modification (ECWM4pp. 353–360. [Google Scholar]
43. Navi, P., Girardet, F. (2000). Effects of thermo-hydro-mechanical treatment on the structure and properties of wood. Holzforschung, 54, 287–293. DOI 10.1515/HF.2000.048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
44. Navi, P., Heger, F. (2004). Combined densification and thermo-hydro-mechanical processing of wood. MRS Bulletin, 29, 332–336. DOI 10.1557/mrs2004.100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
45. Tjeerdsma, B. F., Militz, H. (2005). Chemical changes in hydrothermal treated wood. FTIR analysis of combined hydro thermal and Dry heat-treated wood. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff, 63(2), 102–111. DOI 10.1007/s00107-004-0532-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
46. Welzbacher, C. R., Wehsener, J., Rapp, A. O., Haller, P. (2008). Thermo-mechanical densification combined with thermal modification of Norway spruce (Piceaabies karst) in industrial scale-dimensional stability and durability aspects. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff, 66, 39–49. DOI 10.1007/s00107-007-0198-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
47. Hakkou, M., Petrissans, M., Ceradine, P., Zoulalian, A. (2006). Investigation of the reasons for fungal durability of heat treated beech wood. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 91(2), 393–397. DOI 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.04.042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
48. Khademi, L., Mohebby, B. (2011). Bioresistance of poplar wood compressed by combined hydro-thermo-mechanical wood modification (CHTMSoft-rot and brown-rot. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 65, 866–870. DOI 10.1016/j.ibiod.2011.03.011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
49. Dwainto, W., Inoue, M., Norimoto, M. (1997). Fixation of deformation of wood by heat treatment. Makuzai Gakkaishi, 43(4), 303–309. [Google Scholar]
50. Ohnesorge, D., Richter, K., Becker, G. (2010). Influence of wood properties and bonding parameters on bond durability of european beech glulams. Annals of Forest Science, 67(6), 601–611. DOI 10.1051/forest/2010002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
51. Alvira, P., Tomás-Pejó, E., Ballesteros, M., Negro, M. J. (2010). Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: A review. Bioresource Technology, 101, 4851–4861. DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |