Table of Content

Open Access iconOpen Access

PROCEEDINGS

crossmark

The Comparisons Between Peridynamic Differential Operators and Nonlocal Differential Operators

Xingyu Kan1,*, Yiwei Wang1, Jiale Yan2, Renfang Huang1

1 Key Laboratory for Mechanics in Fluid Solid Coupling Systems, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China
2 College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China

* Corresponding Author: Xingyu Kan. Email: email

The International Conference on Computational & Experimental Engineering and Sciences 2023, 25(2), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.32604/icces.2023.09937

Abstract

Nonlocal differential operators have become an increasingly important tool in the field of numerical modeling and computational science. In recent years, two specific types of nonlocal differential operators have emerged as particularly useful in simulations of material and structural failures, such as fracture and crack propagations in solids. In this paper, the first type of nonlocal operator is based on the nonlocal operator theory in peridynamic theory, which is called PDOs [1,2]. The second type of nonlocal operator is derived from the Taylor series expansion of nonlocal interpolation, which is called NDOs [3-5]. NDOs are usually used to discretize the governing equations in the updated Lagrangian particle hydrodynamics (ULPH) method. While the differences of these two nonlocal operators may seem subtle, and they often cause confusion and misunderstandings. Therefore, this study is devoted to analyze and compare the differences between the two types of differential operators in terms of interpolation accuracy, crack expansion as well as multiphase flow simulation. It is found that, firstly, the NDOs are insensitive to the uniformity of particle distribution, and can converge in both uniform and non-uniform particle distributions, in contrast, PDOs can only yield convergent results in uniform particle distributions. Secondly, in the examples of crack propagation simulation, the results obtained by the PDOs have better agreement with experimental observations, and more suitable to handle the complex crack branching patterns. For simulating the rising bubble problem, NDOs can provide better results for the dynamic behaviors of rising bubble.

Keywords


Cite This Article

APA Style
Kan, X., Wang, Y., Yan, J., Huang, R. (2023). The comparisons between peridynamic differential operators and nonlocal differential operators. The International Conference on Computational & Experimental Engineering and Sciences, 25(2), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.32604/icces.2023.09937
Vancouver Style
Kan X, Wang Y, Yan J, Huang R. The comparisons between peridynamic differential operators and nonlocal differential operators. Int Conf Comput Exp Eng Sciences . 2023;25(2):1-2 https://doi.org/10.32604/icces.2023.09937
IEEE Style
X. Kan, Y. Wang, J. Yan, and R. Huang, “The Comparisons Between Peridynamic Differential Operators and Nonlocal Differential Operators,” Int. Conf. Comput. Exp. Eng. Sciences , vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1-2, 2023. https://doi.org/10.32604/icces.2023.09937



cc Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 386

    View

  • 288

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link