Open Access
ARTICLE
Topic Modelling and Sentimental Analysis of Students’ Reviews
1 Information and Computer Science Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, 31261, Kingdom Saudi Arabia
2 Computer Science Department, School of Computing and Digital Technology, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, B55JU, United Kingdom
* Corresponding Author: Rasheed Mohammad Nassr. Email:
Computers, Materials & Continua 2023, 74(3), 6835-6848. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2023.034987
Received 02 August 2022; Accepted 26 October 2022; Issue published 28 December 2022
Abstract
Globally, educational institutions have reported a dramatic shift to online learning in an effort to contain the COVID-19 pandemic. The fundamental concern has been the continuance of education. As a result, several novel solutions have been developed to address technical and pedagogical issues. However, these were not the only difficulties that students faced. The implemented solutions involved the operation of the educational process with less regard for students’ changing circumstances, which obliged them to study from home. Students should be asked to provide a full list of their concerns. As a result, student reflections, including those from Saudi Arabia, have been analysed to identify obstacles encountered during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, most of the analyses relied on closed-ended questions, which limited student involvement. To delve into students’ responses, this study used open-ended questions, a qualitative method (content analysis), a quantitative method (topic modelling), and a sentimental analysis. This study also looked at students’ emotional states during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. In terms of determining trends in students’ input, the results showed that quantitative and qualitative methods produced similar outcomes. Students had unfavourable sentiments about studying during COVID-19 and positive sentiments about the face-to-face study. Furthermore, topic modelling has revealed that the majority of difficulties are more related to the environment (home) and social life. Students were less accepting of online learning. As a result, it is possible to conclude that face-to-face study still attracts students and provides benefits that online study cannot, such as social interaction and effective eye-to-eye communication.Keywords
Cite This Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.