Open Access

ARTICLE

Are we allowing impact factor to have too much impact: The need to reassess the process of academic advancement in pediatric cardiology?

Rohit S. Loomba¹, Robert H. Anderson²

1 Division of Cardiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
2 Institute of Genetics, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

* Corresponding Author: Robert H. Anderson, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45226. Email:

Congenital Heart Disease 2018, 13(2), 163-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/chd.12593

Abstract

Impact factor has been used as a metric by which to gauge scientific journals for several years. A metric meant to describe the performance of a journal overall, impact factor has also become a metric used to gauge individual performance as well. This has held true in the field of pediatric cardiology where many divisions utilize impact factor of journals that an individual has published in to help determine the individual’s academic achievement. This subsequently can impact the individual’s promotion through the academic ranks. We review the purpose of impact factor, its strengths and weaknesses, discuss why impact factor is not a fair metric to apply to individuals, and offer alternative means by which to gauge individual performance for academic promotion.

---

Keywords

---