Open Access iconOpen Access

REVIEW

crossmark

Saddlepoint Approximation Method in Reliability Analysis: A Review

by Debiao Meng1,2,*, Yipeng Guo1,2, Yihe Xu3, Shiyuan Yang1,2,*, Yongqiang Guo4, Lidong Pan4, Xinkai Guo2

1 School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, China
2 Institute of Electronic and Information Engineering of UESTC in Guangdong, Dongguan, 523808, China
3 Glasgow College, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, China
4 Beijing Research Institute of Mechanical & Electrical Technology, Ltd., Beijing, 100083, China

* Corresponding Authors: Debiao Meng. Email: email; Shiyuan Yang. Email: email

(This article belongs to the Special Issue: Computer-Aided Uncertainty Modeling and Reliability Evaluation for Complex Engineering Structures)

Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences 2024, 139(3), 2329-2359. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2024.047507

Abstract

The escalating need for reliability analysis (RA) and reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) within engineering challenges has prompted the advancement of saddlepoint approximation methods (SAM) tailored for such problems. This article offers a detailed overview of the general SAM and summarizes the method characteristics first. Subsequently, recent enhancements in the SAM theoretical framework are assessed. Notably, the mean value first-order saddlepoint approximation (MVFOSA) bears resemblance to the conceptual framework of the mean value second-order saddlepoint approximation (MVSOSA); the latter serves as an auxiliary approach to the former. Their distinction is rooted in the varying expansion orders of the performance function as implemented through the Taylor method. Both the saddlepoint approximation and third-moment (SATM) and saddlepoint approximation and fourth-moment (SAFM) strategies model the cumulant generating function (CGF) by leveraging the initial random moments of the function. Although their optimal application domains diverge, each method consistently ensures superior relative precision, enhanced efficiency, and sustained stability. Every method elucidated is exemplified through pertinent RA or RBDO scenarios. By juxtaposing them against alternative strategies, the efficacy of these methods becomes evident. The outcomes proffered are subsequently employed as a foundation for contemplating prospective theoretical and practical research endeavors concerning SAMs. The main purpose and value of this article is to review the SAM and reliability-related issues, which can provide some reference and inspiration for future research scholars in this field.

Keywords


Cite This Article

APA Style
Meng, D., Guo, Y., Xu, Y., Yang, S., Guo, Y. et al. (2024). Saddlepoint approximation method in reliability analysis: A review. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 139(3), 2329-2359. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2024.047507
Vancouver Style
Meng D, Guo Y, Xu Y, Yang S, Guo Y, Pan L, et al. Saddlepoint approximation method in reliability analysis: A review. Comput Model Eng Sci. 2024;139(3):2329-2359 https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2024.047507
IEEE Style
D. Meng et al., “Saddlepoint Approximation Method in Reliability Analysis: A Review,” Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 2329-2359, 2024. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2024.047507



cc Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Tech Science Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • 2983

    View

  • 494

    Download

  • 0

    Like

Share Link